In terrific editorial, Needless fight threatens Google's online library, USA Today defends Google's "online library" initiative in convincing and in insightful ways. Excerpts:
"The publishers are not without reasonable arguments, but Google's are better. Copyright law specifically allows limited copying of protected material for purposes that serve the public — such as commentary, news reporting, teaching and scholarship — and Google's plan has broad public benefits. It will greatly expand the universe of knowledge online and could renew interest in out-of-print books.(Emphasis mine.)
"What's more, a ruling that Google needs the specific permission from publishers to index a minimum of information could call into question the very notion of search engines...."
Supreme Court Action: The Right To Remain Silent, Enhancing Sentences Judicially, And Privacy in Motor Vehicle Records - Here are summaries of the other three Supreme Court opinions filed yesterday. The first is Salinas v. Texas (12-246). This case is a mess because the Court c...
11 hours ago